criminal law cases 2018 - An Overview
criminal law cases 2018 - An Overview
Blog Article
seventy seven . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 from the Constitution based about the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to your petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement in the FIR lodged by FIA and while in the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
ninety three . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming to your main case, It's also a nicely-founded proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence within the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty on the charge, however, that is topic to your procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, to the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-respect the evidence and to reach at its independent findings within the evidence.
V) During investigation, the Investigating Officer concluded that fire-arm injury which was fatal towards the deceased was caused from the petitioner but in support of opinion on the Investigating Officer no iota of evidence is on the market to the file and mere ipsi dixit of police is not really binding within the Court.
Information on accessing opinions and case-related documents with the Supreme Court from the United States is accessible around the court’s website.
The court system is then tasked with interpreting the law when it truly is unclear the way it relates to any offered situation, generally rendering judgments based around the intent of lawmakers as well as circumstances in the case at hand. This kind of decisions become a guide for potential similar cases.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming to your main case, It is additionally a well-recognized proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence in the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty in the charge, however, that is matter to your procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-respect the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings within the evidence.
96 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It truly is very well-settled that even though contemplating the case of standard promotion of civil servants, the competent authority has got to think about the benefit of the many qualified candidates and after thanks deliberations, to grant promotion to such eligible candidates who're found being most meritorious amongst them. Because the petitioner was read more held to get senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was disregarded via the respondent department just to increase favor for the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy around the part with the respondent department.
48 . Cr.Misc. 787/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Anwar V/S S.P Complaint Mobile Hyderabad & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD twelve Justice of your Peace u/s 22-A is not really obliged to afford a possibility of hearing on the accused party; nor obliged to always or mechanically issue directions for registration of FIR; but is necessary to take into consideration all relevant factors, with care and caution; to avoid machinery of criminal regulation from being misused; frivolous complaints must be discouraged; relationship, enmity, transactions, litigation and other remedies, are several of the relevant factors. Read more
Civil Courts retain jurisdiction over title disputes in partition matters. Agreement to sell does not confer title; it involves legal transfer of title. Agreement to sell must be developed and properly exhibited in evidence. Declining relief based on an unproduced and un-exhibited sale agreement is legally unsustainable. Read more
I) The above mentioned referred case FIR, for the murder of deceased namely Muhammad Sajjad, was registered within the complaint of Muhammad Sharif son of Ghulam Farid who is father in the petitioner and According to story of FIR, the petitioner is surely an eyewkness on the occurrence.
The scrupulous reader may have noticed something above: a flaw. Beyond the first seven words, the definition focuses over the intention to cause “Injury,” not the intention to cause death. The 2 standard elements that must be proven in order to convict a person of the crime are “
She did note that the boy still needed in depth therapy in order to cope with his abusive past, and “to reach the point of being Safe and sound with other children.” The boy was receiving counseling with a DCFS therapist. Again, the court approved on the actions.
share or interest of a co-owner in immovable property may sold to another co-owner/co-sharer and even to an stranger and section 44(Transfer of Property Act 1882)
Whilst the death penalty is irreversible, life imprisonment allows to the possibility of reconsideration or commutation with the sentence in certain circumstances.